Trust Rules

Printer friendly version
05/03/2010

14-year 'rule' – the accumulation period for gifts involving discretionary trusts

This article outlines why it is important to establish the full gifting history of a settlor when advising clients on inheritance tax (IHT).

Background

There are three main types of gift for IHT purposes. Those that are exempt, those that are potentially exempt (potentially exempt transfer or PET) and chargeable lifetime transfers (CLT).

CLTs are chargeable to a maximum of half the death rate (ie 20%) when the value is transferred. Where the settlor dies within seven years, additional IHT will be due.

PETs are not subject to IHT at the time of the transfer of value, but will become chargeable if the settlor dies within seven years of making the transfer.

Exempt transfers are immediately exempt and are not subject to the seven-year PET rule or ‘entry charge’ of 20% as with CLTs.

When creating PETs and CLTs as part of any IHT planning exercise with a clean gifts history, creating CLTs before PETs will usually help to minimise any possible future IHT tax.

However, where gifts have been made over time, when calculating what nil-rate band (NRB) is available on death, and whether additional tax is due on previous ‘gifts’, the calculation can require information from as far as 14 years previously, not seven years.

For more information please see article 'Making gifts – order of gifting’.

Example scenarios

Scenario 1 – no gifts history
John Jones – dies 1 January 2010 – NRB £325,000 2009/10
John has made no IHT transfers previously and has an estate of £525,000 (assuming annual exemptions of £3,000 already used)
£525,000 - £325,000 NRB = £200,000 x 40% = £80,000 tax

Scenario 2 – gifts history
John Jones – dies 1 January 2010 – NRB £325,000 2009/10
John had made a CLT of £150,000 on 3 January 1996 and a PET of £213,000 on 2 January 2003.

The calculation would be as follows:

Scenario calculation (click image to enlarge)

The PET would fail as seven years has not elapsed between the transfer and John’s death. To calculate whether there is any additional IHT tax to pay on the failed gift we need to consider any other failed PETs (none in this case) or CLTs if within seven years of the PET. The CLT was made within seven years of the failed PET. The CLT of £150,000 would be added to the failed PET (£213,000) to see if additional tax was due. Tax is due on the PET as explained below.

Tax due on the PET:
£150,000 + £213,000 – £325,000 (NRB at death) = £38,000.
£38,000 x 40% = £15,200.

As the failed PET was made between six and seven years prior to death, taper relief would be available reducing the tax due to £15,200 x 20% = £3,040. This would be paid by the recipient of the PET.

For clarity, PETs which have been made more than seven years before death would be exempt so would not be added into any calculation.

Tax due on the estate:
The estate’s NRB will be reduced by the failed PET.
NRB £325,000 - £213,000 = £112,000.
£525,000 - £112,000 = £413,000.
£413,000 x 40% = £165,200.

For clarity, the estate’s NRB will not be reduced by the CLT because it was made seven years prior to death. 

If the PET had been on 4 January 2003 it would still fail, but the CLT would be outside the accumulation period and there would have been no additional tax on the PET, a saving of £3,040.

Conclusion

The need to consider previous transfers should not deter individuals from making gifts, but where there are multiple gifts over an extended period, identifying the possibility of unexpected tax on the gifts as well as a reduction of the available nil-rate band is important should death occur within seven years.

This article is based on Skandia’s interpretation of the law and HM Revenue & Customs practice as at March 2010. We believe this interpretation is correct, but cannot guarantee it. Tax relief and the tax treatment of investment funds may change.

Skandia cannot accept any responsibility for action taken or refrained from being taken in relation to this or any associated communication.

Is this information helpful

More Trust Rules articles