for financial advisers only

Death benefits

Printer friendly version
08/11/2012 Written by: Adrian Walker

Income withdrawal and death benefits

Adrian Walker looks at the death benefit implications of the new income withdrawal regime.

The beginning of the 2011/12 tax year saw significant changes to the tax charges on death benefits from registered pension schemes. These changes, aligned to the increased retirement flexibility also now available, bring new advice issues and financial planning opportunities with clients potentially affected.

Clients can now defer taking any retirement benefits until after their 75th birthday, still have a pension commencement lump sum available to them, and continue to take income withdrawals, through both capped and flexible drawdown, beyond that age (subject to their pension arrangement having this flexibility).

However, there are issues that this flexibility raises. One thing is certain – we are not immortal – we will die. There are two options available from the remaining funds on death:

  • to provide a dependant’s pension, or
  • the payment of a lump sum death benefit.

The table below summarises the current tax treatment of the lump sum death benefits from pension rights built up in registered pension schemes.

  Uncrystallised Crystallised
Pre-age 75 No tax charge on lump sum death benefit below available lifetime allowance – 55% tax charge on lump sums above lifetime allowance – payable by beneficiaries. 55% tax charge on drawdown lump sum death benefits – unless payable to registered charity.
Post-age 75 55% tax charge on any lump sum death benefit – unless payable to registered charity. 55% tax charge on drawdown lump sum death benefit – unless payable to registered charity.

 

The provision of a dependant’s pension does not incur a tax charge other than the normal PAYE income tax, which ordinarily applies to pension income.

However, the 55% tax charge on funds held in income withdrawal for clients who die before age 75 brings into focus alternative planning ideas to reduce the potential tax liability on the capital value. Some thoughts to consider for clients in this area of the market are:

  • Income withdrawal funds (whether capped or flexible drawdown). Should clients take income from the fund and reinvest for themselves, maybe through recycling of income back into new pension contributions? If intending to leave value for others to benefit from should they gift income to them while alive, reducing the effective rate of tax the benefit will suffer?
  • Start to take pension scheme benefits. Clients could use the phased approach to retirement income provision to limit the capital fund values that will move into income withdrawal or annuity purchase in the early years of provision.
  • Income for survivors rather than lump sum. It could be more tax efficient for the spouse to take income from capital rather than receive a lump sum that suffers the 55% tax charge.
  • If the client intends to leave income withdrawal funds to a surviving spouse or financial dependant, ensure the scheme will provide an income withdrawal facility for them.

These changes give the opportunity to review how previous planning recommendations may need to evolve for clients in these market segments. They highlight once again the importance of independent financial advice on such complex planning issues.

This article is based on Skandia’s interpretation of the law and HM Revenue & Customs practice as at November 2012. We believe this interpretation is correct, but cannot guarantee it. Tax relief and the tax treatment of investment funds may change.

Is this information helpful

More Death benefits articles